Abstract
Comments on the commonly‐observed phenomenon that people frequently judge the quality of a product by its price, assuming that the most expensive item is better, and discusses the reasons for this and its implications. Discusses a typical experiment in which university students were given a set of cards, each card with a description of a product and its price, then asked to choose which product they thought they would buy if they had the choice — analysis showed whether, all things being equal, they were more likely to buy the expensive product. Assesses the results of this and discusses them in depth. Concludes this research programme is exceptional in providing so few results but argues against critics.
Keywords
Related Publications
Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations
The authors report a study of the effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ perceptions of product quality and value, as well as their willingness to buy. Hypoth...
Price, brand name, and product composition characteristics as determinants of perceived quality.
While price and brand image have both been found to be determiners of product quality perception, the potency of these two cues has never been directly compared. Moreover, those...
Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations
This paper derives an equilibrium price-quality schedule for markets in which buyers cannot observe product quality prior to purchase. In such markets there is an incentive for ...
The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power
Monopoly, says the dictionary, is the exclusive right of a person, corporation or state to sell a particular commodity. Economic science, investigating the economic aspects of t...
Reference Price Research: Review and Propositions
A substantial body of research evidence has now accumulated in the reference price literature. One stream of research has identified the antecedents of reference price and has a...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1980
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 466-470
- Citations
- 33
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1108/eum0000000004922