Abstract

The growing interest in Structured Equation Modeling (SEM) techniques and recognition of their importance in IS research raises the need to compare and contrast the different types of SEM techniques so that research designs can be selected appropriately. After assessing the extent to which these techniques are currently being used in IS research, the article presents a running example which analyzes the same dataset via three very different statistical techniques. It then compares two classes of SEM: covariance-based SEM and partial-least-squares-based SEM. Finally, the article discusses linear regression models and suggests guidelines as to when SEM techniques and when regression techniques should be used. The article concludes with heuristics and rule of thumb thresholds to guide practice, and a discussion of the extent to which practice is in accord with these guidelines.

Keywords

Structural equation modelingPartial least squares regressionRule of thumbHeuristicsContrast (vision)CovarianceRegression analysisComputer scienceRegressionLinear regressionEconometricsManagement scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceStatisticsMathematicsAlgorithmEngineering

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
article
Volume
4
Citations
6251
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

6251
OpenAlex

Cite This

David Gefen, Detmar W. Straub, Marie‐Claude Boudreau (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 4 . https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.00407

Identifiers

DOI
10.17705/1cais.00407