Abstract

This meta-analysis provides robust consistent evidence that (combinations of) high demands and low decision latitude and (combinations of) high efforts and low rewards are prospective risk factors for common mental disorders and suggests that the psychosocial work environment is important for mental health. The associations are not merely explained by response bias. The impact of work stressors on common mental disorders differs for women and men.

Keywords

PsychosocialJob strainMental healthStressorInclusion (mineral)PsychologyMeta-analysisStatisticSocial supportJob satisfactionClinical psychologyApplied psychologySocial psychologyMedicinePsychiatryStatistics

MeSH Terms

FemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleMental DisordersMental HealthOccupational DiseasesRewardSocial SupportStressPsychologicalWorkplace

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2006
Type
review
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
443-462
Citations
1805
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1805
OpenAlex
65
Influential
1353
CrossRef

Cite This

Stephen Stansfeld, Bridget Candy (2006). Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health , 32 (6) , 443-462. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1050

Identifiers

DOI
10.5271/sjweh.1050
PMID
17173201

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%