Abstract

Contradictory research findings make it almost impossible to arrive at generalized conclusions about the side-bet theory despite the amount of attention this theory has received. In an attempt to resolve the argument about the ability of the theory to explain the formation of organizational commitment, this study examines previous findings of relevant correlational data from 50 published studies, using the Hunter, Schmidt, and Jackson (1982) metaanalysis procedure. Results show that 11 side-bet variables have estimates of low population correlations with organizational commitment. For most of the side-bet variables, no meaningful or generalizable relationships with organizational commitment were found. The results indicate that there is very little empirical support for the side-bet theory. Three possible conclusions are proposed. Discussion of the implications of each conclusion and how they relate to future investigation of the side-bet theory concludes the paper.

Keywords

Argument (complex analysis)Organizational commitmentPsychologySocial psychologyMeta-analysisPopulationSociologyDemographyMedicine

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Notes on the Concept of Commitment

The concept of commitment is widely used but has received little formal analysis. It contains an implicit explanation of one mechanism producing consistent human behavior. Commi...

1960 American Journal of Sociology 3833 citations

Publication Info

Year
1990
Type
article
Volume
43
Issue
10
Pages
1015-1050
Citations
130
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

130
OpenAlex

Cite This

Aaron Cohen, Geula Lowenberg (1990). A Re-examination of the Side-Bet Theory as Applied to Organizational Commitment: A Meta-Analysis. Human Relations , 43 (10) , 1015-1050. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679004301005

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/001872679004301005