Abstract
Abstract “Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description?” (Sandelowski, 2000) was written to critique the prevailing tendency in qualitative health research to claim the use of methods that were not actually used and to clarify a methodological approach rarely identified as a distinctive method. The article has generated several misconceptions, most notably that qualitative description requires no interpretation of data. At the root of these misconceptions is the persistent challenge of defining qualitative research methods. Qualitative description is a “distributed residual category” (Bowker & Star, 2000). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press) in the classification of these methods. Its value lies not only in the knowledge its use can produce, but also as a vehicle for presenting and treating research methods as living entities that resist simple classification. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Res Nurs Health 33:77–84, 2010
Keywords
Qualitative researchInterpretation (philosophy)Value (mathematics)EpistemologySociologyPsychologyComputer scienceLinguisticsSocial sciencePhilosophy
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research
Despite growing recognition of the need for qualitative methods in health services research, there have been few attempts to define quality standards for assessing the results. ...
Methodolatry and Qualitative Health Research
The increasing turn to qualitative research in health psychology raises a number of issues about the appropriate use and relevance of qualitative methods in this field. In this ...
Quality in qualitative research
Qualitative research most commonly involves the systematic collection, ordering, description and interpretation of textual data generated from talk, observation or documentation...
Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta‐analyses
Abstract Meta‐analyses synthesize multiple primary studies and identify patterns of relationships. Differences in primary study methodological quality must be addressed for meta...
Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology
Purpose The paper aims to look at some of the problems commonly associated with qualitative methodologies, suggesting that there is a need for a more rigorous application in ord...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2009
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-84
- Citations
- 4430
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
4430
OpenAlex
Cite This
Margarete Sandelowski
(2009).
What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited.
Research in Nursing & Health
, 33
(1)
, 77-84.
https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/nur.20362