Abstract
Despite growing recognition of the need for qualitative methods in health services research, there have been few attempts to define quality standards for assessing the results. This article acknowledges the desirability of a plurality of standards. However, it is argued that three interrelated criteria can be identified as the foundation of good qualitative health research: interpretation of subjective meaning, description of social context, and attention to lay knowledge. These criteria can be examined in relation to different dimensions of any research report, including theoretical basis, sampling strategy, scope of data collection, description of data collected, and concern with generalizability or typicality. But if the concern is with the appropriateness of care and with understanding the factors that shape lay and clinical behavior, then these criteria must form the basis of a hierarchy of qualitative research evidence.
Keywords
Generalizability theoryQualitative researchMeaning (existential)Scope (computer science)Context (archaeology)PsychologyManagement scienceData collectionQuality (philosophy)Foundation (evidence)Interpretation (philosophy)Health careApplied psychologySociologyEpistemologyComputer scienceSocial sciencePolitical scienceDevelopmental psychology
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research
This is the first in a series of three articles In the past decade, qualitative methods have become more commonplace in areas such as health services research and health techn...
Quality in qualitative research
Qualitative research most commonly involves the systematic collection, ordering, description and interpretation of textual data generated from talk, observation or documentation...
To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales
The concept of data saturation, defined as 'information redundancy' or the point at which no new themes or codes 'emerge' from data, is widely referenced in thematic analysis (T...
Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods
PART ONE: CONCEPTUAL ISSUES IN THE USE OF QUALITATIVE METHODS The Nature of Qualitative Inquiry Strategic Themes in Qualitative Methods Variety in Qualitative Inquiry Theoretica...
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
Developing a universal quality standard for thematic analysis (TA) is complicated by the existence of numerous iterations of TA that differ paradigmatically, philosophically and...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1998
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-351
- Citations
- 982
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
982
OpenAlex
Cite This
Jennie Popay,
Anne Rogers,
Gareth Williams
(1998).
Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research.
Qualitative Health Research
, 8
(3)
, 341-351.
https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800305
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/104973239800800305