Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research

2000 BMJ 3,649 citations

Abstract

This is the first in a series of three articles In the past decade, qualitative methods have become more commonplace in areas such as health services research and health technology assessment, and there has been a corresponding rise in the reporting of qualitative research studies in medical and related journals.1 Interest in these methods and their wider exposure in health research has led to necessary scrutiny of qualitative research. Researchers from other traditions are increasingly concerned to understand qualitative methods and, most importantly, to examine the claims researchers make about the findings obtained from these methods. The status of all forms of research depends on the quality of the methods used. In qualitative research, concern about assessing quality has manifested itself recently in the proliferation of guidelines for doing and judging qualitative work.2–5 Users and funders of research have had an important role in developing these guidelines as they become increasingly familiar with qualitative methods, but require some means of assessing their quality and of distinguishing “good” and “poor” quality research. However, the issue of “quality” in qualitative research is part of a much larger and contested debate about the nature of the knowledge produced by qualitative research, whether its quality can legitimately be judged, and, if so, how. This paper cannot do full justice to this wider epistemological debate. Rather it outlines two views of how qualitative methods might be judged and argues that qualitative research can be assessed according to two broad criteria: validity and relevance. #### Summary points Qualitative methods are now widely used and increasingly accepted in health research, but quality in qualitative research is a mystery to many health services researchers There is considerable debate over the nature of the knowledge produced by such methods and how such research should be judged Antirealists argue …

Keywords

Qualitative researchQuality (philosophy)Health carePsychologyNursingMedicineSociologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceEpistemology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

What is Good Qualitative Research?

Qualitative research has an enormous amount to contribute to the fields of health, medicine and public health but readers and reviewers from these fields have little understandi...

2006 Journal of Health Psychology 389 citations

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
review
Volume
320
Issue
7226
Pages
50-52
Citations
3649
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3649
OpenAlex

Cite This

Nicholas Mays (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ , 320 (7226) , 50-52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50

Identifiers

DOI
10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50