Abstract

The increasing turn to qualitative research in health psychology raises a number of issues about the appropriate use and relevance of qualitative methods in this field. In this article I raise concerns about methodolatry: the privileging of methodological concerns over other considerations in qualitative health research. I argue that qualitative researchers are in danger of reifying methods in the same way as their colleagues in quantitative research have done for some time. Reasons for the pre-eminence of methods are discussed briefly and their consequences considered. The latter include: a concern with ‘proper’ or ‘correct’ methods; a focus on description at the expense of interpretation; a concern with issues of validity and generalizability; an avoidance of theory; an avoidance of the critical; and the stance of the researcher. I offer some suggestions for avoiding methodolatry and some opinions on how we might develop and use qualitative research more effectively in health psychology.

Keywords

Qualitative researchGeneralizability theoryRelevance (law)Health psychologyInterpretation (philosophy)PsychologyField (mathematics)Social psychologyEpistemologyEngineering ethicsSociologyPublic healthMedicineSocial scienceComputer sciencePolitical scienceDevelopmental psychology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
article
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
285-296
Citations
226
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

226
OpenAlex
16
Influential
152
CrossRef

Cite This

Kerry Chamberlain (2000). Methodolatry and Qualitative Health Research. Journal of Health Psychology , 5 (3) , 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910530000500306

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/135910530000500306
PMID
22049137

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%