Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals

2022 Nature 1,809 citations

Abstract

Abstract Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has transformed our understanding of the human brain through well-replicated mapping of abilities to specific structures (for example, lesion studies) and functions 1–3 (for example, task functional MRI (fMRI)). Mental health research and care have yet to realize similar advances from MRI. A primary challenge has been replicating associations between inter-individual differences in brain structure or function and complex cognitive or mental health phenotypes (brain-wide association studies (BWAS)). Such BWAS have typically relied on sample sizes appropriate for classical brain mapping 4 (the median neuroimaging study sample size is about 25), but potentially too small for capturing reproducible brain–behavioural phenotype associations 5,6 . Here we used three of the largest neuroimaging datasets currently available—with a total sample size of around 50,000 individuals—to quantify BWAS effect sizes and reproducibility as a function of sample size. BWAS associations were smaller than previously thought, resulting in statistically underpowered studies, inflated effect sizes and replication failures at typical sample sizes. As sample sizes grew into the thousands, replication rates began to improve and effect size inflation decreased. More robust BWAS effects were detected for functional MRI (versus structural), cognitive tests (versus mental health questionnaires) and multivariate methods (versus univariate). Smaller than expected brain–phenotype associations and variability across population subsamples can explain widespread BWAS replication failures. In contrast to non-BWAS approaches with larger effects (for example, lesions, interventions and within-person), BWAS reproducibility requires samples with thousands of individuals.

Keywords

NeuroimagingSample size determinationReplication (statistics)UnivariateImaging geneticsCognitionPsychologyBrain sizeBrain morphometryPopulationMultiple comparisons problemMultivariate statisticsFunctional magnetic resonance imagingBrain functionMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroscienceComputer scienceStatisticsMachine learning

MeSH Terms

BrainBrain MappingCognitionDatasets as TopicHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingPhenotypeReproducibility of Results

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2022
Type
article
Volume
603
Issue
7902
Pages
654-660
Citations
1809
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1809
OpenAlex
0
Influential

Cite This

Scott Marek, Brenden Tervo‐Clemmens, Finnegan J. Calabro et al. (2022). Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals. Nature , 603 (7902) , 654-660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04492-9

Identifiers

DOI
10.1038/s41586-022-04492-9
PMID
35296861
PMCID
PMC8991999

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%