Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the Demand-Control Model (DCM), accompanied by three goals. Firstly, we used alternative, more focused, and multifaceted measures of both job demands and job control that are relevant and applicable to today's working contexts. Secondly, this study intended to focus on particular demands in human services work and to incorporate these demands in the DCM. Finally, this occupation-based study investigated relatively large well-defined subgroups compared to a total sample. Workers from five human service sectors (n = 2,485) were included in a cross-sectional survey (i.e., health care, transport, bank/insurance, retail trade, and warehouse). Results showed that job demands and job control are able to show several interaction effects on employee well-being and health, but only in specific occupational groups. In conclusion, the current findings provide renewed empirical support for the view that high-strain jobs (high demand, low control) are conducive to ill health (i.e., emotional exhaustion, psychosomatic health complaints). Further, it appears that active jobs (high demands, high control) give rise to positive outcomes (i.e., job challenge, job satisfaction).

Keywords

Job satisfactionPsychologyControl (management)Job controlSample (material)Applied psychologyWork (physics)BusinessDemographic economicsSocial psychologyEconomicsManagement

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
article
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
269-287
Citations
172
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

172
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jan de Jonge, Maureen F. Dollard, Christian Dormann et al. (2000). \nThe Demand-Control Model: Specific demands, specific Control, and well-defined groups. International Journal of Stress Management , 7 (4) , 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009541929536

Identifiers

DOI
10.1023/a:1009541929536