Abstract

The world is banking on a major increase in food production, if the dietary needs and food preferences of an increasing, and increasingly rich, population are to be met. This requires the further expansion of modern agriculture, but modern agriculture rests on a small number of highly productive crops and its expansion has led to a significant loss of global biodiversity. Ecologists have shown that biodiversity loss results in lower plant productivity, while agricultural economists have linked biodiversity loss on farms with increasing variability of crop yields, and sometimes lower mean yields. In this paper we consider the macro-economic consequences of the continued expansion of particular forms of intensive, modern agriculture, with a focus on how the loss of biodiversity affects food production. We employ a quantitative, structurally estimated model of the global economy, which jointly determines economic growth, population and food demand, agricultural innovations and land conversion. We show that even small effects of agricultural expansion on productivity via biodiversity loss might be sufficient to warrant a moratorium on further land conversion.

Keywords

BiodiversityAgricultureProductivityAgricultural biodiversityNatural resource economicsWarrantEconomicsAgricultural productivityPopulationAgricultural economicsProduction (economics)Food processingPopulation growthLand useGeographyEconomic growthEcologyBiology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Competition for land

A key challenge for humanity is how a future global population of 9 billion can all be fed healthily and sustainably. Here, we review how competition for land is influenced by o...

2010 Philosophical Transactions of the Roy... 468 citations

Publication Info

Year
1995
Type
article
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
149-159
Citations
25
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

25
OpenAlex

Cite This

Thomas T. Poleman, Lillian Thomas (1995). Income and dietary change. Food Policy , 20 (2) , 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9192(95)00008-3

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/0306-9192(95)00008-3