Abstract

Centuries of experience make it clear that establishing the effectiveness of a clinical innovation is not sufficient to guarantee its uptake into routine use. The relatively new field of implementation science has developed to enhance the uptake of evidence-based practices and thereby increase their public health impact. Implementation science shares many characteristics, and the rigorous approach, of clinical research. However, it is distinct in that it attends to factors in addition to the effectiveness of the clinical innovation itself, to include identifying and addressing barriers and facilitators to the uptake of evidence-based clinical innovations. This article reviews the definition, history, and scope of implementation science, and places the field within the broader enterprise of biomedical research. It also provides an overview of this Special Issue of Psychiatry Research, which introduces the principles and methods of implementation science to mental health researchers.

Keywords

Scope (computer science)Engineering ethicsField (mathematics)Health careMental healthKnowledge managementManagement sciencePolitical sciencePsychologyComputer scienceEngineeringPsychiatry

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature

THE ULTIMATE PURPOSE of applied health research is to improve health care. Summarizing the literature to adduce recommendations for clinical practice is an important part of the...

1995 JAMA 836 citations

Publication Info

Year
2019
Type
review
Volume
283
Pages
112376-112376
Citations
1042
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1042
OpenAlex

Cite This

Mark S. Bauer, JoAnn Kirchner (2019). Implementation science: What is it and why should I care?. Psychiatry Research , 283 , 112376-112376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.04.025

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.psychres.2019.04.025