Abstract

[First paragraph] A clearly-framed question creates the structure and delineates the approach to defining research objectives, conducting systematic reviews and developing health guidance (Guyatt et al., 2011; Armstrong et al., 2007). To assess the association between exposures and outcomes, including in the field of nutrition, environmental and occupational health, the concept of defining the Population (including animal species), Exposure, Comparator, and Outcomes (PECO) as pillars of the question is increasingly accepted (Morgan et al., 2016; Morgan et al., n.d.). Thus, the PECO defines the objectives of the review or guideline. Furthermore, the PECO informs the study design or inclusion and exclusion criteria for a review, as well as facilitating the interpretation of the directness of the findings based on how well the actual research findings represent the original question.

Keywords

ParagraphAssociation (psychology)GuidelinePsychologyApplied psychologyPopulationGerontologyManagement scienceEnvironmental healthMedicineEngineeringComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2018
Type
article
Volume
121
Issue
Pt 1
Pages
1027-1031
Citations
1061
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

1061
OpenAlex

Cite This

Rebecca L. Morgan, Paul Whaley, Kristina A. Thayer et al. (2018). Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes. Environment International , 121 (Pt 1) , 1027-1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.015

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.015