Publications
13 shownGRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guidelines are inconsistent in how they rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. This article explores the advantages of the GRADE system, which is incr...
Going from evidence to recommendations
The GRADE system classifies recommendations made in guidelines as either strong or weak. This article explores the meaning of these descriptions and their implications for patie...
What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?
Guideline developers use a bewildering variety of systems to rate the quality of the evidence underlying their recommendations. Some are facile, some confused, and others sophis...
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies
Citation: Schünemann, H. J. et al. (2008). 'Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies', BMJ 336 (7653), 1106-1110. [Availab...
Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive
<h3>Abstract</h3> Flavin containing monooxygenases (FMOs) are promiscuous enzymes known for metabolizing a wide range of exogenous compounds. In <i>C. elegans</i>, <i>fmo-2</i> ...
Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations
Guideline panellists have differing opinions on whether resource use should influence decisions on individual patients. As medical care costs rise, resource use considerations b...
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system
Abstract Background Systems that are used by different organisations to grade the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations vary. They have different strengths and...
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations
Should WHO grade the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations? Users of recommendations need to know how much confidence they can place in the underlying evidence...
Frequent Co-Authors
Researcher Info
- h-index
- 13
- Publications
- 14
- Citations
- 45,555
- Institution
- Cochrane
External Links
Identifiers
- ORCID
- 0000-0003-3211-8479
Impact Metrics
h-index: Number of publications with at least h citations each.