GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias

Gordon Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Víctor M. Montori; Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Regina Kunz; Jan Brożek; Pablo Alonso‐Coello; Ben Djulbegovic; David Atkins; Yngve Falck–Ytter; John W Williams; Joerg J Meerpohl; Susan L. Norris; Elie A. Akl; Holger J. Schünemann

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011

Keywords

Funnel plotPublication biasObservational studyReporting biasSuspectMedicineMeta-analysisNon-response biasEvidence-based medicineEvidence-based practiceQuality of evidenceRandomized controlled trialQuality (philosophy)Sample size determinationMEDLINEPsychologyStatisticsAlternative medicine

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

Julie R. Brahmer , Christina Lacchetti , Bryan J. Schneider +26 more

Purpose To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint i...

2018 Journal of Clinical Oncology 3484 citations

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update

Börje Ljungberg , Laurence Albigès , Yasmin Abu‐Ghanem +16 more

The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Guideline Panel has prepared evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for the management of RCC. To provide a...

2019 European Urology 1486 citations

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases

Fujian Song , Susan Parekh , Lee Hooper +7 more

Dissemination of research findings is likely to be a biased process, although the actual impact of such bias depends on specific circumstances. The prospective registration of c...

2010 Health Technology Assessment 981 citations

Corticosteroids as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Influenza: An Updated Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Louise Lansbury , Chamira Rodrigo , Jo Leonardi‐Bee +2 more

Objectives: Corticosteroids may be beneficial in sepsis, but uncertainty remains over their effects in severe influenza. This systematic review updates the current evidence rega...

2019 Critical Care Medicine 201 citations

Raising the bar for systematic reviews with Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews ( <scp>AMSTAR</scp> )

Philipp Dahm

The BJUI has a longstanding track record in promoting the dissemination of high-quality unbiased evidence and helping their readership to understand why the principles of eviden...

2017 British Journal of Urology 15 citations

Publication Info

Year: 2011
Type: article
Volume: 64
Issue: 12
Pages: 1277-1282
Citations: 1739
Access: Closed

External Links

View on DOI.org

Social Impact

Altmetric

GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias

PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1739

OpenAlex

Cite This

APA Style

                            
                                
                                    Gordon Guyatt, 
                                
                                    Andrew D Oxman, 
                                
                                    Víctor M. Montori
                                
                                et al.
                            
                            (2011). 
                            GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias. 
                            Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
                            , 64
                            (12)
                            , 1277-1282.
                            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011
                        

Identifiers

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011