Abstract
Not only are the boundaries of interpretive research as yet undefined, but criteria for judging the quality of such research are even more fluid and emergent. Developing criteria are nominated and cautions in applying them are discussed. The author also suggests two critical insights: The most promising of these criteria are relational, and they effectively collapse the distinction between quality (rigor) and research ethics.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The problem of rigor in qualitative research
There are few explicit discussions in nursing literature of how qualitative research can be made as rigorous as it is relevant to the perspective and goals of nursing. Four fact...
Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research
This article presents a model for quality in qualitative research that is uniquely expansive, yet flexible, in that it makes distinctions among qualitative research’s means (met...
Toward an Agenda for Evaluation of Qualitative Research
Evaluation is essential for research quality and development, but the diversity of traditions that characterize qualitative research suggests that general checklists or shared c...
Standards for Qualitative Research
One of the greatest obstacles to the identification of excellence in qualitative studies is the lack of generally accepted criteria. The criteria developed for quantitative stud...
Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research
The rejection of reliability and validity in qualitative inquiry in the 1980s has resulted in an interesting shift for “ensuring rigor” from the investigator's actions during th...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1995
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-289
- Citations
- 1498
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/107780049500100301