Abstract
This article presents a model for quality in qualitative research that is uniquely expansive, yet flexible, in that it makes distinctions among qualitative research’s means (methods and practices) and its ends. The article first provides a contextualization and rationale for the conceptualization. Then the author presents and explores eight key markers of quality in qualitative research including (a) worthy topic, (b) rich rigor, (c) sincerity, (d) credibility, (e) resonance, (f) significant contribution, (g) ethics, and (h) meaningful coherence. This eight-point conceptualization offers a useful pedagogical model and provides a common language of qualitative best practices that can be recognized as integral by a variety of audiences. While making a case for these markers of quality, the article leaves space for dialogue, imagination, growth, and improvisation.
Keywords
ConceptualizationQualitative researchCredibilityQuality (philosophy)SociologyEpistemologyVariety (cybernetics)ContextualizationEngineering ethicsComputer scienceLinguisticsSocial scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligencePhilosophy
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Catching Goldfish: Quality in Qualitative Research
This paper reviews the contribution of qualitative methods to health services research (HSR) and discusses some of the issues involved in recognizing quality in such work. The p...
Strengthening Qualitative Studies and Reports
This article examines six criteria for conducting qualitative research and evaluating qualitative research reports in social work: (1) identification of the chosen philosophy/ep...
Quality in Qualitative Research
A variety of conceptions of qualitative research exist, with competing claims as to what counts as good quality work. Rather than opting for the criteria promoted by one variety...
Interviewing as qualitative research a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences
The third edition of this bestselling resource provides clear, step-by-step guidance for new and experienced interviewers to help them develop, shape, and reflect on interviewin...
What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?
Guideline developers use a bewildering variety of systems to rate the quality of the evidence underlying their recommendations. Some are facile, some confused, and others sophis...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2010
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 837-851
- Citations
- 6290
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
6290
OpenAlex
Cite This
Sarah J. Tracy
(2010).
Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.
Qualitative Inquiry
, 16
(10)
, 837-851.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/1077800410383121