Abstract

There are few explicit discussions in nursing literature of how qualitative research can be made as rigorous as it is relevant to the perspective and goals of nursing. Four factors complicate the debate about the scientific merits of qualitative research: the varieties of qualitative methods, the lack of clear boundaries between quantitative and qualitative research, the tendency to evaluate qualitative research against conventional scientific criteria of rigor, and the artistic features of qualitative inquiry. A framework for understanding the similarities and differences in research approaches and a summary of strategies to achieve rigor in qualitative research are presented.

Keywords

Qualitative researchRigourPerspective (graphical)Nursing researchEngineering ethicsQualitative marketing researchManagement sciencePsychologyEpistemologySociologyMedicineNursingComputer scienceSocial scienceEngineering

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

What is Good Qualitative Research?

Qualitative research has an enormous amount to contribute to the fields of health, medicine and public health but readers and reviewers from these fields have little understandi...

2006 Journal of Health Psychology 389 citations

Publication Info

Year
1986
Type
article
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
27-37
Citations
2725
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2725
OpenAlex

Cite This

Margarete Sandelowski (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science , 8 (3) , 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005

Identifiers

DOI
10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005