Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study

2000 Administrative Science Quarterly 4,951 citations

Abstract

To assess the effects of a firm's network of relations on innovation, this paper elaborates a theoretical framework that relates three aspects of a firm's ego network—direct ties, indirect ties, and structural holes (disconnections between a firm's partners)—to the firm's subsequent innovation output. It posits that direct and indirect ties both have a positive impact on innovation but that the impact of indirect ties is moderated by the number of a firm's direct ties. Structural holes are proposed to have both positive and negative influences on subsequent innovation. Results from a longitudinal study of firms in the international chemicals industry indicate support for the predictions on direct and indirect ties, but in the interfirm collaboration network, increasing structural holes has a negative effect on innovation. Among the implications for interorganizational network theory is that the optimal structure of interfirm networks depends on the objectives of the network members.

Keywords

Strong tiesStructural holesBusinessIndustrial organizationNetwork structureInterpersonal tiesStructural equation modelingPsychologySocial psychologySociologySocial capitalComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
article
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
425-455
Citations
4951
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

4951
OpenAlex

Cite This

Gautam Ahuja (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly , 45 (3) , 425-455. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2667105