Abstract
Rubin's model for causal inference in experiments and observational studies is enlarged to analyze the problem of “causes causing causes” and is compared to path analysis and recursive structural equations models. A special quasi-experimental design, the encouragement design, is used to give concreteness to the discussion by focusing on the simplest problem that involves both direct and indirect causation. Rubin's model is shown to extend easily to this situation and to specify conditions under which the parameters of path analysis and recursive structural equations models have causal interpretations.
Keywords
Related Publications
Basics of Structural Equation Modeling
PART ONE: BACKGROUND What Does It Mean to Model Hypothesized Causal Processes with Nonexperimental Data? History and Logic of Structural Equation Modeling PART TWO: BASIC APPROA...
Scalable Techniques for Mining Causal Structures
. Mining for association rules in market basket data has proved a fruitful area of research. Measures such as conditional probability (confidence) and correlation have been used...
Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions
Preface to the Second Edition 1. Historical Foundations of Structural Equation Modeling for Continuous and Categorical Latent Variables 2. Path Analysis: Modeling Systems of Str...
Theory, Deduction, and Rules of Correspondence
Causal models are strictly untestable with a single indicator for each variable, unless one assumes very slight measurement error. With multiple indicators for each variable, in...
A tetrad test for causal indicators.
The authors propose a confirmatory tetrad analysis test to distinguish causal from effect indicators in structural equation models. The test uses "nested" vanishing tetrads that...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1988
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 449-449
- Citations
- 305
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/271055