Abstract
Causal models are strictly untestable with a single indicator for each variable, unless one assumes very slight measurement error. With multiple indicators for each variable, incorporated as an extension of the causal model, estimates of the path coefficients may be derived that are subject to sampling variability but are not distorted in the same manner as estimates based on single indicators. Under certain specified conditions, the coefficients thus derived will be inconsistent, thus providing a clue to the existence of nonrandom measurement error of specific kinds. In this paper, procedures for two-indicator and three-indicator models are explored.
Keywords
Variable (mathematics)MathematicsStatisticsExtension (predicate logic)EconometricsObservational errorPath (computing)Causal modelSampling (signal processing)Computer scienceMathematical analysis
Related Publications
Basics of Structural Equation Modeling
PART ONE: BACKGROUND What Does It Mean to Model Hypothesized Causal Processes with Nonexperimental Data? History and Logic of Structural Equation Modeling PART TWO: BASIC APPROA...
Evaluating Effect, Composite, and Causal Indicators in Structural Equation Models1
Although the literature on alternatives to effect indicators is growing, there has been little attention given to evaluating causal and composite (formative) indicators. This pa...
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Model Notation, Covariances, and Path Analysis. Causality and Causal Models. Structural Equation Models with Observed Variables. The Consequences of Measurement Error. Measureme...
A tetrad test for causal indicators.
The authors propose a confirmatory tetrad analysis test to distinguish causal from effect indicators in structural equation models. The test uses "nested" vanishing tetrads that...
Interpretational confounding is due to misspecification, not to type of indicator: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007).
R. D. Howell, E. Breivik, and J. B. Wilcox (2007) have argued that causal (formative) indicators are inherently subject to interpretational confounding. That is, they have argue...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1969
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-263
- Citations
- 217
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
217
OpenAlex
Cite This
Herbert L. Costner
(1969).
Theory, Deduction, and Rules of Correspondence.
American Journal of Sociology
, 75
(2)
, 245-263.
https://doi.org/10.1086/224770
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1086/224770