Abstract
The authors propose a confirmatory tetrad analysis test to distinguish causal from effect indicators in structural equation models. The test uses "nested" vanishing tetrads that are often implied when comparing causal and effect indicator models. The authors present typical models that researchers can use to determine the vanishing tetrads for 4 or more variables. They also provide the vanishing tetrads for mixtures of causal and effect indicators, for models with fewer than 4 indicators per latent variable, or for cases with correlated errors. The authors illustrate the test results for several simulation and empirical examples and emphasize that their technique is a theory-testing rather than a model-generating approach. They also review limitations of the procedure including the indistinguishable tetrad equivalent models, the largely unknown finite sample behavior of the test statistic, and the inability of any procedure to fully validate a model specification.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Evaluating Effect, Composite, and Causal Indicators in Structural Equation Models1
Although the literature on alternatives to effect indicators is growing, there has been little attention given to evaluating causal and composite (formative) indicators. This pa...
Basics of Structural Equation Modeling
PART ONE: BACKGROUND What Does It Mean to Model Hypothesized Causal Processes with Nonexperimental Data? History and Logic of Structural Equation Modeling PART TWO: BASIC APPROA...
Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance
This book reviews the statistical procedures used to detect measurement bias. Measurement bias is examined from a general latent variable perspective so as to accommodate differ...
Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.
The applicability of 5 conventional guidelines for construct measurement is critically examined: (a) Construct indicators should be internally consistent for valid measures, (b)...
Testing Mediational Models With Longitudinal Data: Questions and Tips in the Use of Structural Equation Modeling.
R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986; see record 1987-13085-001) provided clarion conceptual and methodological guidelines for testing mediational models with cross-sectional data....
Publication Info
- Year
- 2000
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-22
- Citations
- 321
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1037/1082-989x.5.1.3