Abstract
The relationship between bureaucratic structure and innovative behavior is examined by comparing the conditions within the bureaucratic structure with the conditions found by psychologists to be most conducive to individual creativity. The conditions within bureaucracy are found to be determined by a drive for productivity and control, and inappropriate for creativity. Suggestions are made for alterations in bureaucratic structure to increase innovativeness, such as, increased professionalization, a looser and more untidy structure, decentralization, freer communications, project organization when possible, rotation of assignments, greater reliance on group processes, attempts at continual restructuring, modification of the incentive system, and changes in many management practices. It is suggested that bureaucratic organizations are actually evolving in this direction. Victor A. Thompson is professor of political science at the Maxwell Graduate School, Syracuse University.
Keywords
BureaucracyRestructuringCreativityProfessionalizationIncentiveDecentralizationOrganizational structurePoliticsPolitical sciencePublic relationsPublic administrationSociologyManagementEconomicsSocial scienceMarket economy
Related Publications
Dimensions of Organization Structure
Five primary dimensions of organization structure were defined and operationalized; (1) specialization, (2) standardization, (3) formalization, (4) centralization, (5) configura...
THE CONCEPT OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND THE AUSTRALIAN STATE IN THE 1980s
Abstract: The adoption of the discourse of management by Australian public services in the 1980s can be seen as a cultural revolution. Results‐oriented management, subordinated ...
A Theory of Racialized Organizations
Organizational theory scholars typically see organizations as race-neutral bureaucratic structures, while race and ethnicity scholars have largely neglected the role of organiza...
AS THE LEFT FOOT FOLLOWS THE RIGHT? THE DYNAMICS OF STRATEGIC AND STRUCTURAL CHANGE.
This study empirically tested the contingency relationship between strategy and structure proposed by Chandler and others with hypotheses linking the probability, timing, and ma...
Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory
We define organizational improvisation as the degree to which the composition and execution of an action converge in time, and we examine the theoretical potential of this defin...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1965
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- Citations
- 1152
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
1152
OpenAlex
16
Influential
615
CrossRef
Cite This
Victor A. Thompson
(1965).
Bureaucracy and Innovation.
Administrative Science Quarterly
, 10
(1)
, 1-1.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2391646
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/2391646