Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists

Keywords

Randomized controlled trialQuality (philosophy)Scale (ratio)Quality ScoreIndex (typography)Computer scienceMedical physicsMedicineMetric (unit)Operations managementSurgery

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration

D G Altman

Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) is less than optimal. Recent methodologic analyses indicate that inadeq...

2001 Annals of Internal Medicine 3794 citations

Unpublished rating scales: A major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia

Max Marshall , Austin Lockwood , Caroline Bradley +3 more

Background A recent review suggested an association between using unpublished scales in clinical trials and finding significant results. Aims To determine whether such an associ...

2000 The British Journal of Psychiatry 850 citations

RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Jonathan A C Sterne , Jelena Savović , Matthew J. Page +25 more

Assessment of risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review on the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is t...

2019 BMJ 25948 citations

Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement

John P. A. Ioannidis

In response to overwhelming evidence and the consequences of poor-quality reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs), many medical journals and editorial groups have now ...

2004 Annals of Internal Medicine 1506 citations

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies

Holger J. Schünemann , Andrew D Oxman , Jan Brożek +9 more

Citation: Schünemann, H. J. et al. (2008). 'Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies', BMJ 336 (7653), 1106-1110. [Availab...

2008 BMJ 1558 citations

Publication Info

Year: 1995
Type: article
Volume: 16
Issue: 1
Pages: 62-73
Citations: 1302
Access: Closed

External Links

View on DOI.org

Social Impact

Altmetric

Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists

PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1302

OpenAlex

Cite This

APA Style

                            
                                
                                    David Moher, 
                                
                                    Alejandro R. Jadad, 
                                
                                    Graham Nichol
                                
                                et al.
                            
                            (1995). 
                            Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. 
                            Controlled Clinical Trials
                            , 16
                            (1)
                            , 62-73.
                            https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-w
                        

Identifiers

DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-w