Abstract
This study seeks to offer a contribution to the works council – organizational performance literature by adding, to date, largely unexplored potential contingencies: the attitudes of Dutch top managers and works councils as to the functioning of the latter, in bad vis-A -vis good times. The overall conclusion from our probit analyses is that the way in which management and works councils interact, and hence the way in which codetermination is implemented, makes all the difference to the firm’s economic position. Our most compelling finding relates to the role of management: a positive attitude of managers toward the works council is positively associated with organizational performance, both in the private and the public sector. In the private sector, this result is even reinforced in times of reorganization.
Keywords
Related Publications
Health Benefit Satisfaction in the Public and Private Sectors: The Role of Distributive and Procedural Justice
One of the most compelling problems outstanding in the field of employee benefits today is trying to control spiraling health care expenditures. Furthermore, as a result of the ...
Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers
This analysis considers the impact of the top managers in an organization on the organization's outcomes, specifically strategic choices and performance levels. The focus is not...
THE BELIEF STRUCTURE OF MANAGERS RELATIVE TO WORK CONCEPTS MEASURED BY A FACTOR ANALYTIC MODEL<sup>1</sup>
Studies in the early seventies suggested that the traditional work ethic position was changing and that the American worker was expressing new needs for interesting and challeng...
How Capital Budgeting Deters Innovation—And What To Do About It
When a company fails to stay dominant in key markets, internal systems of resource allocation may be the cause. decline often begins when financial managers impose strict contr...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2008
- Type
- preprint
- Citations
- 4
- Access
- Closed