Abstract
In Why Do We Recycle? Frank Ackerman examines the arguments for and against recycling, focusing on the debate surrounding the use of economic mechanisms to determine the value of recycling. Based on previously unpublished research conducted by the Tellus Institute, a nonprofit environmental research group in Boston, Massachusetts, Ackerman presents an alternative view of the theory of market incentives, challenging the notion that setting appropriate prices and allowing unfettered competition will result in the most efficient level of recycling. He explains why purely economic approaches to recycling are incomplete and argues for a different kind of decisionmaking, one that addresses social issues, future as well as present resource needs, and noneconomic values that cannot be translated into dollars and cents.
Keywords
Related Publications
Food waste matters - A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications
In recent years, food waste has received growing interest from local, national and European policymakers, international organisations, NGOs as well as academics from various dis...
What are we Gaining from Stakeholder Involvement? Observations from Environmental Planning in the Great Lakes
Attention to the need for greater stakeholder involvement in environmental decisionmaking has been increasing in recent years. The authors draw on a number of cases of environme...
Coping with Collapse: Ecological and Social Dynamics in Ecosystem Management
The role of ecological expertise in policymaking is evolving. In fields such as engineering or medicine, longestablished professional standards guide the application of expertis...
Predicted growth in plastic waste exceeds efforts to mitigate plastic pollution
A mess of plastic It is not clear what strategies will be most effective in mitigating harm from the global problem of plastic pollution. Borrelle et al. and Lau et al. discuss ...
A Conservation assessment of the terrestrial ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean
This priority-setting study elevates, as a first principle, maintaining the representation of all ecosystem and habitat types in regional investment portfolios. Second, it recog...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1996
- Type
- book
- Citations
- 170
- Access
- Closed