Abstract
This priority-setting study elevates, as a first principle, maintaining the representation of all ecosystem and habitat types in regional investment portfolios. Second, it recognizes landscape-level features as an essential guide for effective conservation planning. Without an objective framework to assess the conservation status and biological distinctiveness of geographic areas, donors run the risk of overlooking areas that are seriously threatened and of greatest biodiversity value. The lack of such an objective regional framework prompted this study, whose goals were: 1) to replace the relatively ad hoc decisionmaking process of donors investing in biodiversity conservation with a more transparent and scientific approach; 2) to move beyond evaluations based largely on species lists to a new framework that also incorporates maintaining ecosystems and habitat diversity; 3) to better integrate the principles of conservation biology and landscape ecology into decisionmaking; and 4) to ensure that proportionately more funding be channeled to areas that are of high biological value and under serious threat.
Keywords
Threatened speciesBiodiversityEnvironmental resource managementGeographyConvention on Biological DiversityOptimal distinctiveness theoryIUCN Red ListBiodiversity conservationConservation biologyEcosystem servicesHabitatHabitat conservationEcosystemValue (mathematics)Environmental planningEcologyComputer scienceBiologyEconomics
Related Publications
Preserving Biodiversity: Species, Ecosystems, or Landscapes?
Efforts to preserve biological diversity must focus increasingly at the ecosystem level because of the immense number of species, the majority of which are currently unknown. An...
Freshwater Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Biogeographic Units for Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation
ABSTRACT We present a new map depicting the first global biogeographic regionalization of Earth's freshwater systems. This map of freshwater ecoregions is based on the distribut...
Biological Diversity and Biological Integrity: Current Concerns for Lakes and Streams
In discussing various concepts of biological diversity and biological integrity, we trace development of the terms from a focus on species to a consideration of ecosystems. We u...
Conservation Prioritization Using GAP Data
Data collected by the Gap Analysis Program in the state of Idaho (U.S.A.) are used to prioritize the selection of locations for conservation action and research. Set coverage an...
Mapping Spatial Pattern in Biodiversity for Regional Conservation Planning: Where to from Here?
Vast gaps in available information on the spatial distribution of biodiversity pose a major challenge for regional conservation planning in many parts of the world. This problem...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1996
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 33-5081
- Citations
- 491
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
491
OpenAlex
Cite This
(1996).
A Conservation assessment of the terrestrial ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean.
Choice Reviews Online
, 33
(09)
, 33-5081.
https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-5081
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.5860/choice.33-5081