Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI

2017 New England Journal of Medicine 911 citations

Abstract

Coronary revascularization guided by iFR was noninferior to revascularization guided by FFR with respect to the risk of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year. The rate of adverse procedural signs and symptoms was lower and the procedural time was shorter with iFR than with FFR. (Funded by Philips Volcano; DEFINE-FLAIR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02053038 .).

Keywords

Fractional flow reserveConventional PCIRevascularizationCardiologyInternal medicineMedicineCoronary angiographyFlow (mathematics)Measure (data warehouse)MathematicsComputer scienceMyocardial infarctionData mining

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2017
Type
article
Volume
376
Issue
19
Pages
1824-1834
Citations
911
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

911
OpenAlex

Cite This

Justin E. Davies, Sayan Sen, Hakim‐Moulay Dehbi et al. (2017). Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. New England Journal of Medicine , 376 (19) , 1824-1834. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1700445

Identifiers

DOI
10.1056/nejmoa1700445