Abstract

The importance of interpreting structure coefficients throughout the General Linear Model (GLM) is widely accepted. However, regression researchers too infrequently consult regression structure coefficients to augment their interpretations. The authors reviewed articles published in the Journal of Applied Psychology to determine how interpretations might have differed if standardized regression coefficients and structure coefficients (or else bivariate rs of predictors with the criterion) had been interpreted. Some dramatic misinterpretations or incomplete interpretations are summarized. It is suggested that beta weights and structure coefficients (or else bivariate rs of predictors with the criterion) ought to be interpreted when noteworthy regression results have been isolated.

Keywords

Bivariate analysisStatisticsStandardized coefficientLinear regressionRegressionRegression analysisCross-sectional regressionEconometricsRegression diagnosticMathematicsRegression dilutionPsychologyBayesian multivariate linear regression

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Some Applications of Radial Plots

Abstract A radial plot is a graphical display for comparing estimates that have differing precisions. It is a scatter plot of standardized estimates against reciprocals of stand...

1994 Journal of the American Statistical A... 75 citations

Publication Info

Year
2001
Type
article
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
229-248
Citations
454
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

454
OpenAlex

Cite This

Troy Courville, Bruce Thompson (2001). Use of Structure Coefficients in Published Multiple Regression Articles: β is not Enough. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 61 (2) , 229-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164401612006

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/0013164401612006