Abstract
This analysis of the public debate and riots about abolitionism in antebellum Cincinnati uses constructivist approaches to demonstrate how discourse makes some forms of action possible and legitimate and, conversely, how collective action transforms the meaning and structure of discourse. Two incidents of mob violence in Cincinnati interrupted the discursive struggle over abolitionism, undermining some diagnoses and solutions while making others more compelling. Speakers incorporated the events into their discourses, thus creating new definitions of the situation and new means to resolve the problems it raised, abandoning or reworking discredited arguments, and reframing the issues in the debate. The conclusion discussed this study's implications for understanding the dialectical relationship between cultural representation and social action.
Keywords
DialecticCognitive reframingSociologyAction (physics)Public discourseMeaning (existential)Collective actionRepresentation (politics)AbolitionismEpistemologyCriminologyPolitical scienceLawSocial psychologyPsychologyPolitics
Related Publications
Language and Symbolic Power.
Preface Editor's Introduction General Introduction Part I The Economy of Linguistic Exchanges Introduction 1. The Production and Reproduction of Legitimate Language 2. Price For...
Managerial Dilemmas
In organisation theory a schism has developed between the traditional organisational behaviour literature, based in psychology, sociology and political science, and the more ana...
Exchange and Power in Social Life.
In his landmark study of exchange and power in social life, Peter M. Blau contributes to an understanding of social structure by analyzing the social processes that govern the r...
Cross‐Cultural Testing of Three Social Cognitive Theories: An Application to Condom Use<sup>1</sup>
The aim of this study was to test the cross‐cultural validity of Fishbein and Ajzen's theory of reasoned action, Ajzen's theory of planned behavior, and Triandis' theory of inte...
Community-Based Participatory Research for Health
If Thomas Kuhn (1962) is correct, a field of inquiry develops in stages. Some members of a field of inquiry recognize anomalies in the foundational beliefs and seek better expla...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1995
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100-144
- Citations
- 184
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
184
OpenAlex
Cite This
Stephen Ellingson
(1995).
Understanding the Dialectic of Discourse and Collective Action: Public Debate and Rioting in Antebellum Cincinnati.
American Journal of Sociology
, 101
(1)
, 100-144.
https://doi.org/10.1086/230700
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1086/230700