Keywords
Related Publications
Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis
Trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses may be prone to bias associated with post-randomization exclusion of patients. Wherever possible, the level of such exclusions shou...
Guidelines and caveats for quality of life measurement in clinical practice and research.
"Quality of Life" is rapidly becoming part of the clinical evaluation process, both as a specific outcome measure in formal clinical trials, and as a bedside concept. This paper...
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
PurposeSystematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ from reviews of interventions and diagnostic test accuracy studies and are complex. In fact, conduc...
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarise evidence relating to efficacy and safety of healthcare interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and tra...
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
The number of published systematic reviews of studies of healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical and policy decisions. Systema...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2004
- Type
- letter
- Volume
- 292
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1359-1359
- Citations
- 135
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1001/jama.292.11.1359