Abstract

Trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses may be prone to bias associated with post-randomization exclusion of patients. Wherever possible, the level of such exclusions should be taken into account when assessing the potential for bias in trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Ideally, trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses should be based on all randomized patients.

Keywords

Randomized controlled trialMeta-analysisMedicineRandomizationPublication biasClinical trialInternal medicine

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Empirical Evidence of Bias

<h3>Objective.</h3> —To determine if inadequate approaches to randomized controlled trial design and execution are associated with evidence of bias in estimating treatment effec...

1995 JAMA 5475 citations

Publication Info

Year
2004
Type
article
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
79-87
Citations
212
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

212
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jayne F. Tierney (2004). Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology , 34 (1) , 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh300

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/ije/dyh300