Abstract
Trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses may be prone to bias associated with post-randomization exclusion of patients. Wherever possible, the level of such exclusions should be taken into account when assessing the potential for bias in trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Ideally, trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses should be based on all randomized patients.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
Dissemination of research findings is likely to be a biased process, although the actual impact of such bias depends on specific circumstances. The prospective registration of c...
Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals
The RCTs published in major medical journals do not always clearly report exclusion criteria. Women, children, the elderly, and those with common medical conditions are frequent...
Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
The average bias associated with defects in the conduct of randomised trials varies with the type of outcome. Systematic reviewers should routinely assess the risk of bias in th...
Empirical Evidence of Bias
<h3>Objective.</h3> —To determine if inadequate approaches to randomized controlled trial design and execution are associated with evidence of bias in estimating treatment effec...
Raising the bar for systematic reviews with Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews ( <scp>AMSTAR</scp> )
The BJUI has a longstanding track record in promoting the dissemination of high-quality unbiased evidence and helping their readership to understand why the principles of eviden...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2004
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-87
- Citations
- 212
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dyh300