Abstract

Statistical heterogeneity and small-study effects are 2 major issues affecting the validity of meta-analysis. In this article, we introduce the concept of a limit meta-analysis, which leads to shrunken, empirical Bayes estimates of study effects after allowing for small-study effects. This in turn leads to 3 model-based adjusted pooled treatment-effect estimators and associated confidence intervals. We show how visualizing our estimators using the radial plot indicates how they can be calculated using existing software. The concept of limit meta-analysis also gives rise to a new measure of heterogeneity, termed G(2), for heterogeneity that remains after small-study effects are accounted for. In a simulation study with binary data and small-study effects, we compared our proposed estimators with those currently used together with a recent proposal by Moreno and others. Our criteria were bias, mean squared error (MSE), variance, and coverage of 95% confidence intervals. Only the estimators arising from the limit meta-analysis produced approximately unbiased treatment-effect estimates in the presence of small-study effects, while the MSE was acceptably small, provided that the number of studies in the meta-analysis was not less than 10. These limit meta-analysis estimators were also relatively robust against heterogeneity and one of them had a relatively small coverage error.

Keywords

EstimatorMeta-analysisStatisticsConfidence intervalEconometricsLimit (mathematics)Bayes' theoremMean squared errorMathematicsRandom effects modelVariance (accounting)Computer scienceBayesian probabilityMedicine

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2010
Type
article
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
122-142
Citations
277
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

277
OpenAlex

Cite This

Gerta Rücker, Guido Schwarzer, James R. Carpenter et al. (2010). Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis. Biostatistics , 12 (1) , 122-142. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxq046

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/biostatistics/kxq046