Abstract

These twelve organizations appear to have little in common. They are public and private, national and international, profit-making and charitable, religious and secular, civil and military, and, depending on one's perspective, benign and nefarious. Yet they do share three characteristics. First, each is a relatively large, hierarchically organized, centrally directed bureaucracy. Second, each performs a set of relatively limited, specialized, and, in some sense, technical functions: gathering intelligence, investing money, transmitting messages, promoting sales, producing copper, delivering bombs, saving souls. Third, each organization performs its functions across one or more international boundaries and, insofar as is possible, in relative disregard of those boundaries.

Keywords

BureaucracyPoliticsPerspective (graphical)Profit (economics)Political sciencePolitical economyPublic administrationSociologyEconomicsLawNeoclassical economics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The New Economics of Organization

Over the last ten years or so, an important approach to the study of organizations has emerged within economics. It is perhaps best characterized by three elements: a contractu...

1984 American Journal of Political Science 1926 citations

Institutions and organizations

Institutions—the structures, practices, and meanings that define what people and organizations think, do, and aspire to—are created through process. They are “work in progress” ...

1995 Choice Reviews Online 8140 citations

Publication Info

Year
1973
Type
article
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
334-368
Citations
206
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

206
OpenAlex

Cite This

Samuel P. Huntington (1973). Transnational Organizations in World Politics. World Politics , 25 (3) , 334-368. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010115

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2010115