Abstract
Abstract Purpose – This paper attempts to reconcile two opposing views of the strategies and conduct of closely held firms: that of entrepreneurship and that of family business. The former view suggests that these firms tend to be value maximizing organizations that pursue growth strategies and outperform. The latter often argues that these businesses are utility maximizers that pursue conservative harvest strategies and fail to outperform. Design/methodology/approach – In order to reconcile the controversy, this paper examines the literature in an attempt to relate ownership priorities and risk taking preferences to governance distinctions relating to family involvement, ownership, and management. Findings – It concludes that the value‐maximization expectations of the entrepreneurship literature apply only to lone or unrelated founder businesses whose owners, unencumbered by family distractions, embrace growth and outperform. By contrast the utility‐maximization expectations of the family business literature apply when there are multiple family owners or executives. These parties are argued to be harvest‐oriented, mediocre performers, especially after a new generation has entered the firm. This may be because their priorities and loyalties are shared between business and family considerations. However, family and lone founder firm outcomes are argued to be further shaped by owners' levels of control and ownership, their managerial roles, and the breadth of family personal and generational involvement. Practical implications – The analysis has implications for the effective governance, board composition, and management of these different types of firms. Originality/value – The paper reconciles two important literatures to derive implications for strategy and performance that must be addressed by agents of corporate governance in family and founder firms.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Management Ownership and Corporate Performance: An Empirical Analysis
We investigate the relation between management ownership and corporate performance, as measured by Tobin's Q.In a cross-section of Fortune 500 firms, Tobin's Q first increases a...
Socialization Patterns of Successors in First- to Second-Generation Family Businesses
This paper focuses on the socialization of potential successors in family business and attempts to relate this process to values that founders intend to convey to the next gener...
Integrating Time Into Family Business Research
Organizational ambidexterity refers to a firm’s ability to pursue both exploitation and exploration orientations. Despite research that suggests ambidexterity is a critical phen...
Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills
This paper challenges the prevalent notion that family-owned firms are more risk averse than publicly owned firms. Using behavioral theory, we argue that for family firms, the p...
The Effect of Family Control on Firm Value and Performance: Evidence from Continental Europe
Abstract We investigate the relation between ownership structure and firm performance in Continental Europe, using data from 675 publicly traded corporations in 11 countries. Al...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2008
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-56
- Citations
- 103
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1108/17554250810909419