Abstract
Abstract The paper compares year-to-year changes in the Wiesenberger Index of Return for investment funds of similar objectives. It is initially shown, using correlation techniques, that there was little consistency in yearly performance of the funds during the period from 1951 to 1960. This result serves as support for the assumption that a fund's relative performance in any one year is strictly a random occurrence. We might, therefore, define a “successful” management as one whose fund will be in the top half of funds with similar objectives with probability of at least .7. It is then shown, using a Bayesian approach, that only 28 funds out of a sample of 128 would have judged themselves superior at odds in excess of even money, with the given criterion.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
ABSTRACT Using a sample free of survivor bias, I demonstrate that common factors in stock returns and investment expenses almost completely explain persistence in equity mutual ...
Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows
ABSTRACT Examining a shock to the salience of the sustainability of the U.S. mutual fund market, we present causal evidence that investors marketwide value sustainability: being...
Counting Processes and Survival Analysis.
Preface. 0. The Applied Setting. 1. The Counting Process and Martingale Framework. 2. Local Square Integrable Martingales. 3. Finite Sample Moments and Large Sample Consistency ...
Cognitive Components of Risk Ratings
This study examined what lay people mean when they judge the “risk” of activities that involve the potential for accidental fatalities (e.g., hang gliding, living near a nuclear...
SECURITY PRICES, RISK, AND MAXIMAL GAINS FROM DIVERSIFICATION*
Sections II and III of this paper set forth the simple logic which leads directly to the determination of explicit equilibrium prices of risk assets traded in competitive market...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1963
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 304
- Pages
- 1011-1032
- Citations
- 3
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1963.10480683