Abstract

What makes organizations so similar? We contend that the engine of rationalization and bureaucratization has moved from the competitive marketplace to the state and the professions. Once a set of organizations emerges as a field, a paradox arises: rational actors make their organizations increasingly similar as they try to change them. We describe three isomorphic processes-coercive, mimetic, and normative—leading to this outcome. We then specify hypotheses about the impact of resource centralization and dependency, goal ambiguity and technical uncertainty, and professionalization and structuration on isomorphic change. Finally, we suggest implications for theories of organizations and social change.

Keywords

Rationalization (economics)AmbiguityNormativeBureaucracyOrganizational fieldRationalityProfessionalizationIsomorphism (crystallography)Field (mathematics)Positive economicsPolitical scienceSociologyInstitutional logicPoliticsEconomicsSocial scienceComputer scienceLaw

Related Publications

Institutions and organizations

Institutions—the structures, practices, and meanings that define what people and organizations think, do, and aspire to—are created through process. They are “work in progress” ...

1995 Choice Reviews Online 8140 citations

Publication Info

Year
2004
Type
book-chapter
Pages
143-166
Citations
25913
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

25913
OpenAlex

Cite This

Paul DiMaggio, Walter W. Powell (2004). The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Advances in strategic management , 143-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1