Abstract

Feedback is an essential construct for many theories of learning and instruction, and an understanding of the conditions for effective feedback should facilitate both theoretical development and instructional practice. In an early review of feedback effects in written instruction, Kulhavy (1977) proposed that feedback’s chief instructional significance is to correct errors. This error-correcting action was thought to be a function of presentation timing, response certainty, and whether students could merely copy answers from feedback without having to generate their own. The present meta-analysis reviewed 58 effect sizes from 40 reports. Feedback effects were found to vary with control for presearch availability, type of feedback, use of pretests, and type of instruction and could be quite large under optimal conditions. Mediated intentional feedback for retrieval and application of specific knowledge appears to stimulate the correction of erroneous responses in situations where its mindful ( Salomon & Globerson, 1987 ) reception is encouraged.

Keywords

CertaintyCorrective feedbackConstruct (python library)Test (biology)Presentation (obstetrics)PsychologyFeedback regulationComputer scienceCognitive psychologyControl (management)Peer feedbackMathematics educationArtificial intelligence

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1991
Type
article
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
213-238
Citations
1240
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1240
OpenAlex

Cite This

Robert L. Bangert‐Drowns, Chen‐Lin C. Kulik, James A. Kulik et al. (1991). The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events. Review of Educational Research , 61 (2) , 213-238. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002213

Identifiers

DOI
10.3102/00346543061002213