Abstract

currently and (we predict) in other countries in the near future. In the second paper 3 we described a variety of instructional methods that have been shown to improve student learning. In this part we consider the application of some of those methods to the development of the desired skills. Process skills are “soft” skills used in the application of knowledge. The degree to which students develop these skills determines how they solve problems, write reports, function in teams, self-assess and do performance reviews of others, go about learning new knowledge, and manage stress when they have to cope with change. Many instructors intuitively believe that process skills are important, but most are unaware of the fundamental research that provides a foundation for development of the skills. Their efforts to help their students develop the skills may consequently be less effective than they might wish. 4,5 Fostering the development of skills in students is challenging, to say the least. Process skills—which have to do with attitudes and values as much as knowledge—are particularly challenging in that they are hard to define explicitly, let alone to develop and assess. We might be able to sense that a team is not working well, for example, but how do we make that intuitive judgment quantitative? How might we provide feedback that is helpful to the team members? How can we develop our students’ confidence in their teamwork skills?

Keywords

Variety (cybernetics)TeamworkProcess (computing)Function (biology)Skills managementSoft skillsTransferable skills analysisPsychologyKnowledge managementComputer scienceMedical educationHigher educationPedagogySocial psychologyArtificial intelligenceMedicineManagement

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
article
Citations
251
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

251
OpenAlex

Cite This

Donald R. Woods, Richard M. Felder, Armando Rugarcía et al. (2000). THE FUTURE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION III. DEVELOPING CRITICAL SKILLS. .