Abstract
The authors propose a global/local processing style model (GLOMO) for assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. GLOMO is based on Schwarz and Bless' (1992, 2007) inclusion-exclusion model, which suggests that when information is included into a category, assimilation occurs, whereas when information is excluded from a category, contrast occurs. According to GLOMO, inclusion versus exclusion should be influenced by whether people process information globally or locally. In 5 experiments, using both disambiguation and social comparison, the authors induced local versus global processing through perceptual tasks and time perspective and showed that global processing produced assimilation, whereas local processing produced contrast. The experiments showed that processing styles elicited in one task can carry over to other tasks and influence social judgments. Furthermore, they found that hemisphere activation and accessibility of judgment-consistent knowledge partially mediated these effects. Implications for current and classic models of social judgment are discussed.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Implicit stereotyping in person judgment.
Three experiments demonstrated implicit gender stereotyping. A target's social category determined the use of previously primed stereotyped information, without Ss' awareness of...
Mood effects on the organization of person information
Abstract Subjects in a positive, neutral, or negative mood were presented with behaviour descriptions exemplifying different categories to investigate mood effects on the organi...
Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans
When stimuli with larger forms (global) containing smaller forms (local) are presented to subjects with large lesions in the right hemisphere, they are more likely to miss the g...
Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat.
Subjects were divided into information seekers (high monitors)/information avoiders (low monitors) and distractors (high blunters)/nondistractors (low blunters) on the basis of ...
Inferences of ability and effort: Evidence for two different processes.
Past research and theory on causal inference has not explored the effects of varying the reliability of information. In two experiments, subjects judged either ability (given pe...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2008
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 579-599
- Citations
- 205
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.579