Testing for Intellectual Impairment—Some Comments on the Tests and the Testers

1959 Journal of Mental Science 13 citations

Abstract

Psychologists are frequently asked to say whether, in the case of a particular patient, there is evidence of organic dementia. At first sight this would not appear to be an unreasonable request. A considerable amount is known about the performance of normal people on tests of cognitive function and it might be supposed that people who work with tests of human ability should be able to modify their procedures to the purpose of diagnosing intellectual deterioration when this is not obvious on routine neurological or psychiatric examination. Moreover, it might seem that the frequent presence of independent criteria of brain damage provided by neurological and neurosurgical investigations should facilitate the development of competent diagnostic clinical psychology in the neurological field.

Keywords

DementiaSightPsychologyIntellectual impairmentNeurological examinationCognitionPsychiatryTest (biology)MedicineClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPathologyDisease

MeSH Terms

BrainBrain DiseasesHumansMental DisordersPsychological Tests

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Abstract What are the boundary zones between normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease (AD)? Are many elderly people whom we regard as normal actually in the early stages of AD? Alzh...

2003 197 citations

Publication Info

Year
1959
Type
article
Volume
105
Issue
439
Pages
489-495
Citations
13
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

13
OpenAlex
0
Influential
12
CrossRef

Cite This

Malcolm Piercy (1959). Testing for Intellectual Impairment—Some Comments on the Tests and the Testers. Journal of Mental Science , 105 (439) , 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.105.439.489

Identifiers

DOI
10.1192/bjp.105.439.489
PMID
13665312

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%