Abstract
Abstract Once the data from a clinical trial are available for analysis it is common practice to carry out ‘tests of baseline homogeneity’ on prognostic covariates before proceeding to analyse the effects of treatment on outcome variables. It is argued that this practice is philosophically unsound, of no practical value and potentially misleading. Instead it is recommended that prognostic variables be identified in the trial‐plan and fitted in an analysis of covariance regardless of their baseline distribution (statistical significance).
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Statistical methods for the identification and use of prognostic factors
Abstract This is an expository paper which reviews the rationale for determining prognostic factors and the statistical methods for finding and allowing for such factors in the ...
Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model
Abstract Multiple imputation is commonly used to impute missing data, and is typically more efficient than complete cases analysis in regression analysis when covariates have mi...
Analysis of Growth and Dose Response Curves
SUMMARY A method of analysis of 'growth curves' that utilizes the technique of analysis of covariance is developed and illustrated. The method yields results identical to those ...
Semiparametric Regression for the Mean and Rate Functions of Recurrent Events
Summary The counting process with the Cox-type intensity function has been commonly used to analyse recurrent event data. This model essentially assumes that the underlying coun...
Non‐parametric analysis of treatment—covariate interaction in the presence of censoring
Abstract The demonstration of varying treatment efficacy among different subsets of patients is an important part of the analysis of clinical trials. The paper commences by clar...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1994
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1715-1726
- Citations
- 466
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/sim.4780131703