Systematic Review of Guidelines on Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

2010 Archives of Internal Medicine 135 citations

Abstract

Differences among the guidelines imply important variation in allocation of preventive interventions. To make informed decisions, physicians should use only the recommendations from rigorously developed guidelines.

Keywords

GuidelineMedicineCINAHLDyslipidemiaMEDLINEPsychological interventionFamily medicineCochrane LibraryRisk assessmentSystematic reviewEnvironmental healthAlternative medicineNursingPathologyPolitical scienceDisease

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

Since 1980, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) have translated scientific evidence into clinical practice guidelines (guidelines) with...

2017 Hypertension 7231 citations

Publication Info

Year
2010
Type
review
Volume
170
Issue
1
Pages
27-27
Citations
135
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

135
OpenAlex

Cite This

Bart S. Ferket (2010). Systematic Review of Guidelines on Cardiovascular Risk Assessment. Archives of Internal Medicine , 170 (1) , 27-27. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.434

Identifiers

DOI
10.1001/archinternmed.2009.434