2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

Abstract

Since 1980, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) have translated scientific evidence into clinical practice guidelines (guidelines) with recommendations to improve cardiovascular health.In 2013, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Advisory Council recommended that the NHLBI focus specifically on reviewing the highest-quality evidence and partner with other organizations to develop recommendations.P-1,P-2 Accordingly, the ACC and AHA collaborated with the NHLBI and stakeholder and professional organizations to complete and publish 4 guidelines (on assessment of cardiovascular risk, lifestyle modifications to reduce cardiovascular risk, management of blood cholesterol in adults, and management of overweight and obesity in adults) to make them available to the widest possible constituency.In 2014, the ACC and AHA, in partnership with several other professional societies, initiated a guideline on the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure (BP) in adults.Under the management of the ACC/ AHA Task Force, a Prevention Subcommittee was appointed to help guide development of the suite of guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD).These guidelines, which are based on systematic methods to evaluate and classify evidence, provide a cornerstone for quality cardiovascular care.The ACC and AHA sponsor the development and publication of guidelines without commercial support, and members of each organization volunteer their time to the writing and review efforts.Guidelines are official policy of the ACC and AHA. HypertensionJune 2018of clinical practice.The Task Force may also invite organizations and professional societies with related interests and expertise to participate as partners, collaborators, or endorsers. Relationships With Industry and Other EntitiesThe ACC and AHA have rigorous policies and methods to ensure that guidelines are developed without bias or improper influence.The complete relationships with industry and other entities (RWI) policy can be found online.Appendix 1 of the present document lists writing committee members' relevant RWI.For the purposes of full transparency, writing committee members' comprehensive disclosure information is available online.Comprehensive disclosure information for the Task Force is available online. Evidence Review and Evidence Review CommitteesIn developing recommendations, the writing committee uses evidence-based methodologies that are based on all available data.P-6-P-9 Literature searches focus on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but also include registries, nonrandomized comparative and descriptive studies, case series, cohort studies, systematic reviews, and expert opinion.Only key references are cited.An independent evidence review committee (ERC) is commissioned when there are 1 or more questions deemed of utmost clinical importance that merit formal systematic review.The systematic review will determine which patients are most likely to benefit from a drug, device, or treatment strategy and to what degree.Criteria for commissioning an ERC and formal systematic review include: a) the absence of a current authoritative systematic review, b) the feasibility of defining the benefit and risk in a time frame consistent with the writing of a guideline, c) the relevance to a substantial number of patients, and d) the likelihood that the findings can be translated into actionable recommendations.ERC members may include methodologists, epidemiologists, healthcare providers, and biostatisticians.The recommendations developed by the writing committee on the basis of the systematic review are marked with "SR." Guideline-Directed Management and TherapyThe term guideline-directed management and therapy (GDMT) encompasses clinical evaluation, diagnostic testing, and pharmacological and procedural treatments.For these and all recommended drug treatment regimens, the reader should confirm the dosage by reviewing product insert material and evaluate the treatment regimen for contraindications and interactions.The recommendations are limited to drugs, devices, and treatments approved for clinical use in the United States. Class of Recommendation and Level of EvidenceThe Class of Recommendation (COR) indicates the strength of the recommendation, encompassing the estimated magnitude and certainty of benefit in proportion to risk.The Level of Evidence (LOE) rates the quality of scientific evidence that supports the intervention on the basis of the type, quantity, and consistency of data from clinical trials and other sources (Table 1).P-6-P-8

Keywords

Affiliated Institutions

• Smith Family AU
• Jackson Memorial Hospital US
• Spencer Foundation US
• Williams & Associates US
• Mahindra Group (India) IN
• Bruce Technologies (United States) US
• Williams (United States) US
• Jones College US

Related Publications