Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration

2021 BMJ 1,511 citations

Abstract

Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies allow a better understanding of the causal effects of modifiable exposures on health outcomes, but the published evidence is often hampered by inadequate reporting. Reporting guidelines help authors effectively communicate all critical information about what was done and what was found. STROBE-MR (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation) assists authors in reporting their MR research clearly and transparently. Adopting STROBE-MR should help readers, reviewers, and journal editors evaluate the quality of published MR studies. This article explains the 20 items of the STROBE-MR checklist, along with their meaning and rationale, using terms defined in a glossary. Examples of transparent reporting are used for each item to illustrate best practices.

Keywords

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiologyObservational studyChecklistQuality (philosophy)Meaning (existential)MedicineGlossaryElaborationMEDLINEEpidemiologyPsychologyMedical educationPathologyLinguisticsPolitical scienceCognitive psychology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2021
Type
article
Volume
375
Pages
n2233-n2233
Citations
1511
Access
Closed

Citation Metrics

1511
OpenAlex
29
Influential
1126
CrossRef

Cite This

Veronika Skrivankova, Rebecca C. Richmond, Benjamin Woolf et al. (2021). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration. BMJ , 375 , n2233-n2233. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2233

Identifiers

DOI
10.1136/bmj.n2233
PMID
41223895
PMCID
PMC12611437

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%