Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business

1994 Business Ethics Quarterly 180 citations

Abstract

Abstract: This paper discusses the normative ethical theory of the business firm advanced principally by William E. Evan and R. Edward Freeman. According to their stakeholder theory, the firm should be managed for the benefit of its stakeholders: indeed, management has a fiduciary obligation to stakeholders to act as their agent. In this paper I seek to clarify the theory by discussing the concept of a stakeholder and by distinguishing stakeholder theory from two varieties of stockholder theory—I call them ‘pure’ and ‘tinged.’ I argue that the distinctive claims of stakeholder theory, as contrasted with tinged stockholder theories, have been inadequately supported by argument.

Keywords

Stakeholder theoryStakeholderFiduciaryNormativeShareholderObligationArgument (complex analysis)Business ethicsBusinessStakeholder managementTheory of the firmLaw and economicsPublic relationsSociologyManagementPolitical scienceEconomicsCorporate governanceLawIndustrial organization

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1994
Type
article
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
431-443
Citations
180
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

180
OpenAlex

Cite This

Bruce Langtry (1994). Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business. Business Ethics Quarterly , 4 (4) , 431-443. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857342

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/3857342