Abstract

In this paper the financial incentives of executives are analyzed, theoretically and econometrically, with particular emphasis on the relationship between executive motivations and the sales-maximization hypothesis. Executive financial incentives are found to be primarily related to firm stock market performance. The sales performance of the firm has no consistent positive or negative effect on executive financial return. The structures of individual firms' compensation packages were tested for effects on firm performance. It was found that firms with executives whose financial rewards more closely paralleled stockholders' interests performed better in the stock market over the postwar period. For this sample of firms it was concluded that the hypothesis of present-value maximization better explains firm behavior than the hypothesis of sales maximization. It is the conclusion of this author that the sales-maximization hypothesis does not usefully characterize the "typical oligopolist," as has been asserted by William J. Baumol.

Keywords

MaximizationEarningsIncentiveEquity (law)ShareholderExecutive compensationEnterprise valueEconomicsValue (mathematics)BusinessFinancial economicsMicroeconomicsMonetary economicsAccountingFinanceCorporate governance

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1971
Type
article
Volume
79
Issue
6
Pages
1278-1292
Citations
216
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

216
OpenAlex

Cite This

Robert T. Masson (1971). Executive Motivations, Earnings, and Consequent Equity Performance. Journal of Political Economy , 79 (6) , 1278-1292. https://doi.org/10.1086/259835

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/259835