Abstract

This paper inquires whether psychology should be internalist or externalist, that is, whether it should consider mind as an entity in itself, or rather as a relation with the environment. Some influential theoretical arguments for internalist psychology are critically reviewed and it is concluded that there is no compelling reason for internalist psychological taxonomies. Next, some proposals for a functional or relational type of explanation in psychology are explored, and it is argued that they provide a workable alternative for internalist explanations. Finally, Gibson's ecological psychology is adduced to show the empirical feasibility of a psychology that explicitly includes environmental considerations in psychological taxonomies.

Keywords

Internalism and externalismExternalismEpistemologyPsychologyRelation (database)Cognitive scienceSocial psychologyPhilosophyComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Minds, Machines and Metaphors

It is well-known that between about 1945 and 1970 the mind (brain) of man was an electronic digital computer; indeed it is so well-known that one might suppose the issues thereb...

1977 Social Studies of Science 102 citations

Publication Info

Year
1997
Type
article
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
147-172
Citations
20
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

20
OpenAlex

Cite This

Huib Looren de Jong (1997). Some Remarks on a Relational Concept of Mind. Theory & Psychology , 7 (2) , 147-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354397072001

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/0959354397072001