Abstract

A role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders proposes that perceived incongruity between the female gender role and leadership roles leads to 2 forms of prejudice: (a) perceiving women less favorably than men as potential occupants of leadership roles and (b) evaluating behavior that fulfills the prescriptions of a leader role less favorably when it is enacted by a woman. One consequence is that attitudes are less positive toward female than male leaders and potential leaders. Other consequences are that it is more difficult for women to become leaders and to achieve success in leadership roles. Evidence from varied research paradigms substantiates that these consequences occur, especially in situations that heighten perceptions of incongruity between the female gender role and leadership roles.

Keywords

Prejudice (legal term)Social psychologyPsychologyPerception

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Gender, language, and influence.

Mixed- and same-sex dyads were observed to examine effects of gender composition on language and of language on gender differences in influence. Ss discussed a topic on which th...

1990 Journal of Personality and Social Psy... 606 citations

Publication Info

Year
2002
Type
review
Volume
109
Issue
3
Pages
573-598
Citations
6180
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

6180
OpenAlex

Cite This

Alice H. Eagly, Steven J. Karau (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.. Psychological Review , 109 (3) , 573-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573