Abstract
Recent work has suggested that mergers or acquisitions between strategically related firms will generate abnormal returns for shareholders of bidding firms. Empirical evidence on this hypothesis has been mixed. The relatedness hypothesis is refined by arguing that relatedness is not a sufficient condition for acquiring firms to earn abnormal returns. Rather, only when bidding firms enjoy private and uniquely valuable synergistic cash flows with targets, inimitable and uniquely valuable synergistic cash flows with targets, or unexpected synergistic cash flows, will acquiring a related firm result in abnormal returns for the shareholders of bidding firms.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance
The purpose of this article is to show how the concept of stakeholders in an organization can be used to understand the tasks of the board of directors. The authors argue that a...
Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business
Abstract: This paper discusses the normative ethical theory of the business firm advanced principally by William E. Evan and R. Edward Freeman. According to their stakeholder th...
Managerial Incentives and Corporate Investment and Financing Decisions
ABSTRACT This paper examines the relationship between common stock and option holdings of managers and the choice of investment and financing decisions by firms. The authors fin...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1988
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 71-78
- Citations
- 558
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250090708