Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis

1988 Strategic Management Journal 558 citations

Abstract

Recent work has suggested that mergers or acquisitions between strategically related firms will generate abnormal returns for shareholders of bidding firms. Empirical evidence on this hypothesis has been mixed. The relatedness hypothesis is refined by arguing that relatedness is not a sufficient condition for acquiring firms to earn abnormal returns. Rather, only when bidding firms enjoy private and uniquely valuable synergistic cash flows with targets, inimitable and uniquely valuable synergistic cash flows with targets, or unexpected synergistic cash flows, will acquiring a related firm result in abnormal returns for the shareholders of bidding firms.

Keywords

BiddingShareholderCashMergers and acquisitionsBusinessEmpirical evidenceCash flowMicroeconomicsIndustrial organizationMonetary economicsEconomicsFinanceCorporate governance

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1988
Type
article
Volume
9
Issue
S1
Pages
71-78
Citations
558
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

558
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jay B. Barney (1988). Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal , 9 (S1) , 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090708

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/smj.4250090708